28
Jul 11

Five Strategies for Tax-Efficient Investing

Five Strategies for Tax-Efficient Investing

 

Key Points

As just about every investor knows, it's not what your investments earn, but
what they earn after taxes
that counts. After factoring in federal income and capital gains taxes, the
alternative minimum tax, and any applicable state and local taxes, your
investments' returns in any given year may be reduced by 40% or more.

For example, if you earned an average 8% rate of return annually on an
investment taxed at 28%, your after-tax rate of return would be 5.76%. A
$50,000 investment earning 8% annually would be worth $107,946 after 10 years;
at 5.76%, it would be worth only $87,536. Reducing your tax liability is key to
building the value of your assets, especially if you are in one of the higher
income-tax brackets. Here are five ways to potentially help lower your tax
bill.1

 

Invest in Tax-Deferred and Tax-Free Accounts

 

Tax-deferred accounts include company-sponsored retirement savings accounts
such as traditional 401(k) and 403(b) plans, traditional individual retirement
accounts (IRAs), and annuities. Contributions to these accounts may be made on
a pretax basis (i.e., the contributions may be tax-deductible) or on an
after-tax basis (i.e., the contributions are not tax-deductible). More
important, investment earnings compound tax deferred until withdrawal,
typically in retirement, when you may be in a lower tax bracket. Contributions
to nonqualified annuities, Roth IRAs and Roth-style employer-sponsored savings
plans are not tax-deductible. Earnings that accumulate in Roth accounts can be
withdrawn tax free if you have held the account for at least five years and
meet the requirements for a qualified distribution.

Pitfalls to avoid:
Withdrawals prior to age 59½ from a qualified retirement plan, IRA, Roth IRA,
or annuity may be subject not only to ordinary income tax, but also to an
additional 10% federal tax. In addition, early withdrawals from annuities may
be subject to additional penalties charged by the issuing insurance company.
Also, if you have significant investments, in addition to money you contribute
to your retirement plans, consider your overall portfolio when deciding which
investments to select for your tax-deferred accounts. If your effective tax
rate -- that is, the average percentage of income taxes you pay for the year --
is higher than 15%, you'll want to evaluate whether investments that earn most
of their returns in the form of long-term capital gains might be better held outside of a
tax-deferred account. That's because withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts
generally will be taxed at your ordinary income tax rate, which may be higher
than your capital gains tax rate (see "Income vs. Capital Gains").

 

Consider Government and Municipal Bonds
Interest on U.S. government issues is subject to federal taxes but is exempt
from state taxes. Municipal bond income is generally exempt from federal taxes,
and municipal bonds issued in-state may be free of state and local taxes as
well. An investor in the 33% federal income-tax bracket would have to earn
7.46% on a taxable bond to equal the tax-exempt return of 5% offered by a
municipal bond, before state taxes. Sold prior to maturity or bought through a
bond fund, government and municipal bonds are subject to market fluctuations
and may be worth less than the original cost upon redemption.

Pitfalls to avoid:
If you live in a state with high state income tax rates, be sure to compare the
true taxable-equivalent yield of government issues, corporate bonds, and
in-state municipal issues. Many calculations of taxable-equivalent yield do not
take into account the state-tax exemption on government issues. Because
interest income (but not capital gains) on municipal bonds is already exempt
from federal taxes, there's generally no need to keep them in tax-deferred
accounts. Finally, income derived from certain types of municipal bond issues,
known as private activity bonds, may be a tax-preference item subject to the
federal alternative minimum tax.

Look for Tax-Efficient Investments

 

Tax-managed or tax-efficient investment accounts and mutual funds are
managed in ways that can help reduce their taxable distributions. Investment
managers can employ a combination of tactics, such as minimizing portfolio
turnover, investing in stocks that do not pay dividends, and selectively
selling stocks that have become less attractive at a loss to counterbalance
taxable gains elsewhere in the portfolio. In years when returns on the broader
market are flat or negative, investors tend to become more aware of capital
gains generated by portfolio turnover, since the resulting tax liability can
offset any gain or exacerbate a negative return on the investment.

Pitfalls to avoid:
Taxes are an important consideration in selecting investments but should not be
the primary concern. A portfolio manager must balance the tax consequences of
selling a position that will generate a capital gain versus the relative market
opportunity lost by holding a less-than-attractive investment. Some mutual
funds that have low turnover also inherently carry an above-average level of
undistributed capital gains. When you buy these shares, you effectively buy
this undistributed tax liability.

Put Losses to Work

 

At times, you may be able to use losses in your investment portfolio to help
offset realized gains. It's a good idea to evaluate your holdings periodically
to assess whether an investment still offers the long-term potential you
anticipated when you purchased it. Your realized losses in a given tax year
must first be used to offset realized capital gains. If you have
"leftover" losses, you can offset up to $3,000 against ordinary
income. Any remainder can be carried forward to offset gains or income in
future years, subject to certain limitations.

Pitfalls to avoid:
A few down periods don't mean you should sell simply to realize a loss. Stocks
in particular are long-term investments subject to ups and downs. However, if
your outlook on an investment has changed, you can use a loss to your
advantage.

Keep Good Records

 

Keep records of purchases, sales, distributions, and dividend reinvestments so
that you can properly calculate the basis of shares you own and choose the
shares you sell in order to minimize your taxable gain or maximize your
deductible loss.

Pitfalls to avoid:
If you overlook mutual fund dividends and capital gains distributions that you
have reinvested, you may accidentally pay the tax twice -- once on the
distribution and again on any capital gains (or underreported loss) -- when you
eventually sell the shares.

Keeping an eye on how taxes can affect your investments is one of the easiest
ways you can enhance your returns over time. For more information about the tax
aspects of investing, consult a qualified tax advisor.

 

Points to Remember

 

  1. Taxes on income and capital gains
    distributions reduce your after-tax rate of return.
  2. Maximize opportunities to invest in
    tax-deferred and tax-free retirement accounts.
  3. Consider your overall investment portfolio
    when selecting investments for tax-deferred and tax-free accounts. You might
    first allocate investments that generate interest income to tax-qualified
    accounts, since withdrawals from these accounts are taxed as ordinary income.
  4. Income from municipal bonds is generally
    exempt from federal and in some cases state and local taxes. Capital gains are
    taxable, and returns from some types of municipal bonds may be subject to the
    alternative minimum tax.
  5. Tax-managed mutual funds and investment
    accounts employ strategies aimed at reducing taxable distributions.
  6. Realized capital losses can be offset against
    capital gains, and up to $3,000 in losses can be offset against ordinary income
    in a given tax year.
  7. Maintaining good records of investment
    purchases, sales, and distributions is essential to evaluating the best method
    of determining gains and losses for tax purposes and calculating the adjusted
    cost basis of an investment.

 

1This information is general in nature and is not meant as tax
advice. Always consult a qualified tax advisor for information as to how taxes
may affect your particular situation.

###

© 2011 McGraw-Hill
Financial Communications. All rights reserved.

 

July 2011 — This column is provided through the Financial
Planning Association, the membership organization for the financial planning
community, and is brought to you by Ronald J VanSurksum, CFP® , a local member
of FPA.

27
Jul 11

Washington Hotline - July - Week 4 - 2011

President Obama and Speaker Boehner Negotiate
President Obama and Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) have been meeting each week to seek a solution for the budget crisis.  Both indicate that there has not yet been an agreement on how to resolve the issue.  Both have been advised by a small group of finance advisors from the White House and the Office of the Speaker.

President Obama spoke to the press on July 15.  He stated, "We don't need more studies, we don't need a balanced budget amendment, but we simply need to make these tough choices and take on our bases."  The President was indicating that many of the Democratic Members of the House and Senate are unhappy with some of the potential budget cuts.  In an address to the nation on Friday, July 22 President Obama stated that negotiations with Speaker Boehner are on hold.  However, given the need to avoid a default, it is likely that there will be further negotiations between the President and the Speaker before the August 2 deadline.

Speaker Harry Reid (D-NV) was not in their meeting.  However, he stated, "The President always talked about balance.  There had to be some fairness in this.  There has to be some revenue in the cuts.  My caucus agrees with that.  I hope the President sticks with that.  I'm confident he will."  Majority Leader Reid continues to emphasize that Senate Democrats are hopeful there will be a balance between budget cuts and tax increases.

Several Washington commentators noted that a potential change this week occurred when a key "no tax" advocate for the first time discussed the potential for increased tax rates on upper-income Americans.  While the majority of House and Senate Republicans have signed the "no tax increase" pledge, it is possible that a failure to extend the Bush tax cuts might "technically" be considered to be a retention of the Clinton era top tax bracket of 39.6%.  Therefore, it may not be "technically" considered a tax increase.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) suggested, "This is a coded message from one of the truest believers in the Republican Party that it's time for conservatives to step back from the brink."  He indicated that the door may be open to a "balanced approach that both cuts spending and raises revenue."

When asked about this option, Speaker Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor indicated that they remain opposed to any tax increases.

Editor's Note: The bipartisan debate by House and Senate Members and the negotiations by President Obama and Speaker Boehner will continue.  President Obama states that he is still hopeful to achieve a "grand bargain."  Speaker Boehner has remained low profile during the past week, but set a vote deadline of Wednesday, July 27 for the House and Senate to meet the August 2 deadline.  As that date grows ever closer, there will need to be a compromise before the U.S. is in imminent risk of default.  However, even an expected final compromise still faces an uncertain vote in both the House and Senate.

Senate "Gang of Six" Publishes Proposal

Following release of the plan created by the Fiscal Commission in 2010, six Senators committed to preparing a bipartisan plan based on that report.

Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL), Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) and Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) published their report on July 19, 2011.

The "Gang of Six" senators stated that they have created "a comprehensive plan with immediate savings and the process to achieve savings in both defense and non-defense spending, enact cost-saving health reforms, insure 75-year Social Security solvency, fundamentally reform the United States tax code, and reduce spending elsewhere in the budget."

The proposed plan includes three principal sections.  First, there are discretionary spending caps that are designed to produce immediate spending cuts of $500 billion.  In addition, all of the government inflation indexing would use a "chained CPI" that is believed to be a more accurate indexing method.

Second, taxes would be lowered to a top rate of 29%.  There would be no alternative minimum tax.  Through a major change in the permitted itemized deductions, the rate would be lowered, AMT would be eliminated and the income tax would generate an additional $1 trillion over 10 years.  The changes that would reduce itemized deductions are not listed.

Third, there would be specific spending caps on different sections within the government.  If Congress did not pass legislation within the targeted spending limits, there would be triggers that require spending cuts within those departments.  The result of the three-part plan would be a reduction of $3.7 trillion over 10 years.

President Obama stated, "It would not match perfectly with some of the approaches that we've taken, but I think that we're in the same playing field.  And my hope is that we can start gathering everybody over the next couple days to choose a clear direction and get this issue resolved."

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) indicated, "We have begun reviewing the Gang of Six proposal and while there are still portions that are unclear and need more detail, this bipartisan plan does seem to include some constructive ideas to deal with our debt."

Editor's Note: Both the Fiscal Commission and the "Gang of Six" are bipartisan solutions.  There is now a growing recognition in Washington of the need for a budget solution.  The proposal by the "Gang of Six" will be helpful to both President Obama and Speaker Boehner.  After they achieve a proposed solution by August 2, it will be necessary to obtain approval in both the House and the Senate.  The developing bipartisan consensus that action is necessary will be helpful in that effort.

Senate Rejects Cut, Cap and Balance

On a largely party-line vote, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 2560, the "Cut, Cap and Balance Act of 2011."  The bill would reduce federal spending, create a cap on spending and require passage of a balanced budget act.

The cut in spending is projected to be $111 billion in 2012.  Total federal spending would be reduced from approximately 24% of the economy today to 22.5% in 2012 and 19.9% by 2017.  The balanced budget amendment to the Constitution would require a 2/3 favorable vote in the House and Senate and ratification by 3/4 or 38 of the states.

The White House stated that it "strongly opposes" the act.  It indicated, "Neither setting arbitrary spending levels nor amending the Constitution is necessary to restore fiscal responsibility."

Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) stated, "Americans get it. And I want to thank every American who's spoken out in favor of the Cut, Cap and Balance Plan.  Today the American people will now know where we stand."

Editor's Note: Your editor and this organization do not take a specific position on this debate over the budget deficit in Washington.  We offer these updates as a service to our readers because this pending compromise will have impact on every American.

Applicable Federal Rate of 2.2% for August – Rev. Rul. 2011-16; 2011-32 IRB 1 (18 Jul. 2011)

The IRS has announced the Applicable Federal Rate (AFR) for August of 2011.  The AFR under Section 7520 for the month of August will be 2.2%. The rates for July of 2.4% or June of 2.8% also may be used.  The highest AFR is beneficial for charitable deductions of remainder interests.  The lowest AFR is best for lead trusts and life estate reserved agreements.  With a gift annuity, if the annuitant desires greater tax-free payments the lowest AFR is preferable.  During 2011, pooled income funds in existence less than three tax years must use a 2.8% deemed rate of return. Federal rates are available by clicking here.

21
Jul 11

How Can I Tell Whether It Is a Good Time to Refinance My Mortgage?

It may be worthwhile to refinance if you can lower your monthly payment by a
significant margin and you plan to stay in your home long enough to recoup the
cost of refinancing.

 

To Refinance or Not

Consider this example: If you had a $200,000, 30-year mortgage with an 8%
interest rate, your monthly payment would be $1,468. If you refinanced at 6%,
your new monthly payment would be $1,199, a savings of $269 per month. Assuming
your new closing costs amounted to $2,000, it would take eight months to break
even. ($269 x 8 = $2,152) If you planned to stay in your home for at least
eight more months, then a refinancing would be appropriate under these
conditions. If you planned to sell the house before then, you might not want to
bother refinancing.

 

All Mortgages Are Not Created Equal

When considering whether to refinance, don't choose a mortgage based only on
its stated annual percentage rate (APR), because there are many other important
variables to consider.

 

  • The term of the mortgage - Shorter terms can
    result in significantly reduced interest costs over time. On the other hand,
    they may require higher monthly payments.
  • The variability of the interest rate - An
    adjustable rate may be lower initially when compared with a fixed rate, but
    adjustable rates are likely to move upward over time. With a fixed rate, there
    is greater certainty regarding your monthly payment over the life of the
    mortgage.
  • Points  - Also known as origination fees, points
    are paid to a lender or mortgage broker at closing. One point usually equals
    one percent of the loan's value. Mortgages described as "no-cost" or
    "zero points" do not carry this upfront cost but may charge a higher
    interest rate, which may add to the long-term cost of the loan.
  • Other mortgage-related fees - When you refinance,
    you may pay a mortgage broker fee (assuming you do not go directly to a bank or
    other lender), a title insurance premium, a commitment fee, attorney or
    settlement fees, an appraisal fee, and other costs that add up quickly.

 

The amount of money you may save and how long you plan to live in your home
are key variables that influence whether you should refinance your mortgage.

 

How Much Could You Save by Refinancing?
Rate After             New Monthly            Monthly               Months to
Refinancing            Payment                   Savings                Break Even

7.5%                             $1,398                    $69                            29

7.0%                             $1,331                    $137                           15

6.5%                             $1,264                   $204                          10

6.0%                             $1,199                   $269                           8

5.5%                              $1,136                  $332                            7

5.0%                              $1,074                 $394                            6

 

A homeowner with a 30-year, $200,000 mortgage charging 8% interest would pay
$1,468 each month. This table illustrates the potential monthly savings and the
various break-even periods (assuming $2,000 in closing costs) that would result
from refinancing at different rates.

 

Source: ChartSource, Standard & Poor's. Months to break even rounded up
to the next highest month. Does not consider the impact of taxes. (CS0000215)

###

© 2011 McGraw-Hill
Financial Communications. All rights reserved.

July 2011 — This column is provided through the Financial
Planning Association, the membership organization for the financial planning
community, and is brought to you by Ronald J VanSurksum, CFP® , a local member
of FPA.