Advanced Asset Management

More about Advanced Asset Management

Helping You Develop Wealthy Habits and Make the Most of your Financial Potential

My mission is to help you Plan for your goals, Manage your resources and Maximize your financial potential.

I work for you and offer comprehensive services to help you make better financial decisions. With Advanced Asset Management, YOU get to choose how you want to work with a financial advisor.

Because Ronald J VanSurksum is a fee-only advisor, most conflicts of interest are removed from the advisory process. Learn more about how Advanced Asset Management works for you.

Call me today to schedule a no-obligation meeting to explore how we can serve you: (616) 531.5220

Learn more About Us, Our Services, Our Staff, our investment Partners and Links, or Contact us and get your own AAM Newsletter subscription.

Posted: 14 Feb 2011

Washington Hotline - June 18, 2013

Camp Opposes Charitable Deduction Cap

House Ways and Means Committee Chair Dave Camp (R-MI) spoke June 12th at the Federal Policy Groups 2013 Tax, Budget, and Legislative Policy Seminar. At the Washington conference, Camp explained the tax reform process and also responded to questions. When asked about the White House proposal to cap charitable deduction tax benefits at the 28% bracket, Camp replied, "I think it is important not to cap that area."

As part of his address, Camp explained many of the steps that have been taken toward major tax reform this year.

1. January – The financial products tax proposals were introduced.

2. February – Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) reserved H.R. 1 as the bill number for tax reform. This is a symbolic action by the Speaker that shows tax reform to be a high priority for this year.

3. March – The small business and pass-through draft provisions were released. These would change the taxation for partnerships, subchapter S corporations and other small businesses.

4. Hearings – During January through May there were multiple hearings on charitable contribution deductions, the mortgage interest deduction, state and local tax deductions and other similar topics.

5. Working Groups – The members of both parties on the House Ways and Means Committee were assigned to 11 different working groups. Each group is seeking bipartisan input on a specific area of tax reform.

6. May – Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and Camp initiated a "Write Rosty" campaign. This is named after Rep. Dan Rostenkowski who was Chair of the House Ways and Means Committee during the 1986 tax reform. The two leaders created taxreform.gov and @simplertaxes. Through the website and Twitter they have received ideas and suggestions from over 9,000 taxpayers.

7. May – Camp met with Republican freshman and Ways and Means Committee Members from both parties to discuss tax reform.

Camp acknowledged that there are major challenges to tax reform. He states that there still is a long path to a completed tax reform bill. He outlined three major problems for specific segments of America that are reasons for tax reform.

1. Public Companies – The tax code is extremely complex and is a major "barrier to success" that may cause American companies to fall behind international competitors.

2. Families – The tax code is "too complex, too costly and too time consuming." For example, there are 15 different provisions that could create education tax savings. There are 90 pages of explanation for these provisions. The typical family with students might quote the brilliant physicist Albert Einstein, who said, "The hardest thing in the world to understand is income taxes."

3. Small Businesses – The "mind-numbing maze of tax rules" require businesses to spend extensively for accounting assistance and live with the threat of an audit.

Camp concluded that the tax code is a "wet blanket on the economy" and in dire need of repair. He stated, "Fixing our broken tax code means it will be more conducive to innovation, investment and sustained job creation. We will see paychecks start to rise again and we will safeguard the American dream for generations to come."

Editor's Note: Camp and Baucus announced this week that they will conduct town hall meetings in Michigan and Montana over the summer. Citizens will have a direct opportunity to discuss their feelings about taxes. The schedule and locations will be announced by their staff.

Debt Limit Reached

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reports that the nation has now reached the $16.7 trillion federal debt limit. During the first eight months of this fiscal year, the deficit was $626 billion. With the tax savings from increased taxes and budget sequestration, the CBO projects that the September 30 deficit number will be $642 billion. This is down substantially from the $1.09 trillion deficit the prior year.

The budget numbers are improved because revenues are up 15% to $1.8 trillion. These revenues are increased because of higher tax rates and modest economic growth. In addition, due to the sequestration of the budget, federal spending is expected to increase 0.8% this year.

The last budget surplus occurred in fiscal year 2001.

Editor's Note: The government will be able to survive on internal borrowing from pension funds until the end of September. At that time it will be necessary to negotiate an increase in the debt limit. The White House would prefer an increase with no other provisions. However, Speaker of the House Boehner has proposed that the amount of the debt limit increase be equal to additional budget reductions. Given the improving economy and budget picture, it is possible that there will be a budget compromise in late September or early October.

Senate Finance Committee Charitable Reform Options

As part of the budget reform process, the Senate Finance Committee staff has prepared a comprehensive report that summarizes the potential changes that have been discussed in Senate hearings. These changes cover charitable deductions, business activities of nonprofits, political activities and general nonprofit issues.

Charitable Deductions

1. Credit – The charitable deduction could be converted from a deduction to a 15% credit. This would make gifts more favorable for lower-income taxpayers.

2. Deduction Cap – The White House has proposed limiting deduction tax benefits to the 28% bracket. Another option for a cap would be a flat deduction limit such as $50,000.

3. 2% Floor – Some hearing witnesses have suggested that there could be a 2% floor on charitable deductions. Only the itemized deductions in excess of that amount would be permitted.

4. PEASE Limits – The PEASE limits create a reduced itemized deduction by 3% of the amount over a floor. This can impact philanthropic individuals in states with no state income tax. One option is to exempt charitable gifts from the PEASE limit.

5. April 15 Deadline – Another potential way of increasing charitable gifts is to allow gifts up until April 15 to qualify for the prior year.

6. Noncash Gifts – Gifts of appreciated property are generally deductible at fair market value. A potential change is to require these items to be deductible only at cost basis.

7. Conservation Easements – Several witnesses have suggested that there should be stricter limits on qualified property. In addition, there could be IRS audits of conservation charities to ensure that they are properly enforcing conservation easements.

Business Activities of Nonprofits

1. Medical Centers – Proposals have been advanced to create minimum levels of required charity care.

2. Expanded UBIT – The unrelated business income tax definitions for related use and regularly carried on could be made more stringent.

Political Activity

1. Political Actions – Sec. 501(c)(4) organizations could have more stringent limits on their political activity.

2. Disclosure – The amounts and type of expenditures for lobbying and other political purposes could be subject to greater disclosure.

General Nonprofit

1. Excise Tax – Private foundations presently are subject to a 1% or 2% excise tax on income. This system would be combined into a single tax at 1.4%.

2. Endowment Taxes – If charities did not spend a certain percentage of endowment, there would be an excise tax.

3. Endowments – There would be a minimum 5% expenditure requirement.

4. Donor Advised Funds – There would be a minimum 5% distribution requirement.

5. Executive Compensation – There could be more specific definitions that explain the level of compensation that constitutes an impermissible private benefit.

Editor's Note: The Senate Finance Committee staff has prepared a laundry list of potential changes. Very few of these are likely to be enacted. However, they do show some of the discussion topics for the committee as it prepares for tax reform. The study by the staff also shows the commitment of Sen. Baucus to moving forward with a tax bill this year.

Applicable Federal Rate of 1.2% for June -- Rev. Rul. 2013-12; 2013-23 IRB 1 (16 May 2013)

The IRS has announced the Applicable Federal Rate (AFR) for June of 2013. The AFR under Section 7520 for the month of June will be 1.2%. The rates for May of 1.2% or April of 1.4% also may be used. The highest AFR is beneficial for charitable deductions of remainder interests. The lowest AFR is best for lead trusts and life estate reserved agreements. With a gift annuity, if the annuitant desires greater tax-free payments the lowest AFR is preferable. During 2013, pooled income funds in existence less than three tax years must use a 1.8% deemed rate of return. Federal rates are available by clicking here.

Posted: 18 Jun 2013

AAM Weekly Market Wrap - June 17, 2013

Weekly Market Wrap: Stocks slipped this week on a World Bank global growth downgrade and concerns regarding the limits of global stimulus.

 

For The Week

  • The S&P 500 lost 1.01% to 1,626.73
  • Oil added 1.90% to $97.85
  • Gold gained 0.80% to $1,390.29
  • The US Dollar fell another 1.01% to $80.65 against other major world currencies.

2013 Year-To-Date for the major indexes:

 

  • The S&P index +14.06%
  • The Dow Jones Index +15.00%
  • The NASDAQ Index +13.38%
  • The Russell 2000 Small cap Index +15.54%
  • EAFE International Index +5.33%
  • 10 Year Treasury Yield is 2.11%, lower for the week and higher for the year
  • 30 Year Treasury Yield is 3.39%, lower for the week and higher for the year
  • WTI Crude Oil Index +6.57%
  • Bloomberg Gold Index -16.95%
  • The Dollar Index +1.05% against other major world currencies

 

 

Monday the S&P Index lost 1 point on low volume despite an upgrade to the US credit rating by S&P to “stable” 2 years after they initially lowered it.  Overseas trade, lending and inflation data out of China disappointed, Japan 1Q GDP was revised higher, French industrial production beat and Italian GDP and industrial production missed.

Tuesday the index fell 17 points on moderate volume as small business optimism hit a one-year high and wholesale inventories were up.  Overseas, no additional stimulus announcements from Japan and German courts discussed the legality of the Euro bond purchase program.

Wednesday stocks slumped 14 points on moderate volume as doubts regarding the future benefits of global stimulus surfaced and in the US mortgage applications rose.

Thursday stocks rebounded 24 points on moderate volume as jobless claims continued to drop and retail sales beat expectations snapping the first 3-day US stock losing streak of the year.  Overseas Japan’s Nikkei dropped over 6% sending its market into bear territory and the World Bank downgraded world growth estimates.

Friday the S&P 500 lost 10 points on moderately light volume as consumer sentiment declined, industrial production was flat and producer prices rose.

 

Takeaways from this week:

  • The upgrade of the US credit rating was based on the outlook of the US economy and is a good sign for future market prospects.  Overall it was a decent week for US data, but not much data was released.
  • World stocks moved lower once again this week with Japan continuing to lead the way.
  • The US dollar has slipped considerably over the last few weeks.

 

 

Mortgage rates dropped his week.  The national averages as reported by Bloomberg indicate a 15-year rate of 3.07% and a 30-year rate of 3.94%. These rates are as of 06/17/2013 and may include points.

 

What to watch for on the economic calendar next week:


Monday – NY Manufacturing / Housing Market Index

Tuesday – Consumer Prices / Housing Starts

Wednesday – FOMC Meeting Announcement and Forecasts

Thursday – Jobless Claims / Existing Home Sales / PMI Manufacturing / Philly Manufacturing / Leading Indicators

Friday – No data

 

 

Ronald J. VanSurksum, CFP®
Advanced Asset Management, LLC

June 17, 2013

 

 

 

Posted: 17 Jun 2013

Classifying Stocks

If you want to understand the stock market, you should understand the different ways in which people classify and identify stocks.1 Here is a summary of some different stock types.

 

Stock Sectors

 

A sector is a group of companies that loosely belong to the same industry and provide the same product or service. Examples of stock sectors include airlines, software, chemicals, oil, retail, automobiles, and pharmaceuticals, to name just a few. Understanding sectors is important if you want to make money in the stock market. The reason is simple: No matter how the market is doing and no matter what the condition of the economy, there are always sectors that are doing well and sectors that are struggling.

 

It's a lot harder to pick successful sectors than many people think. Nevertheless, it's worth taking the time to understand and identify the various sectors and to be aware of which sectors are strong and which are weak. This could give you a clue as to where the economy is headed.
Income Stocks

 

Income stocks include shares of corporations that give money back to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some investors, usually older individuals who are near retirement, are attracted to income stocks because they live off the income in the form of dividends and interest on the stocks and bonds they own. In addition, stocks that pay a regular dividend are less volatile. They may not rise or fall as quickly as other stocks, which is fine with the conservative investors who tend to buy income stocks. Another advantage of stocks that pay dividends is that the dividends reduce the loss if the stock price goes down.

 

There are also a number of disadvantages of buying income stocks. If the company doesn't raise its dividend each year -- and many don't -- inflation can cut into your profits. Finally, income stocks can fall just as quickly as other stocks. Just because you own stock in a so-called conservative company doesn't mean you will be protected if the stock market falls.
Value Stocks

 

Value stocks are stocks of profitable companies that are selling at a reasonable price compared with their true worth, or value. The trick, of course, is determining what a company is really worth -- what investors call its intrinsic value. Some low-priced stocks that seem like bargains are low-priced for a reason.

 

Value stocks are often those of old-fashioned companies, such as insurance companies and banks, that are likely to increase in price in the future, even if not as quickly as other stocks. It takes a lot of research to find a company whose price is a bargain compared with its value. Investors who are attracted to value stocks have a number of fundamental tools that they use to find these bargain stocks.

Growth Stocks

 

Growth stocks are the stocks of companies that are expected to grow faster than the competition. The price of growth stocks can be very high even if the company's earnings aren't spectacular. This is because growth investors believe that the corporation will earn money in the future and are willing to take the risk.

 

Most of the time, growth stocks won't pay a dividend, as the corporation wants to use every cent it earns to improve or grow the business. Because growth stocks are so volatile, they can make sudden price moves in either direction. This is attractive to short-term traders, but may be unnerving for many investors.

Source/Disclaimer:

1Investing in stocks involves risk, including loss of principal.

Required Attribution

Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications or its sources, neither S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications nor its sources guarantees the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or availability of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. In no event shall S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications be liable for any indirect, special or consequential damages in connection with subscriber's or others' use of the content.

 

© 2013 S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications. All rights reserved.

 

Posted: 14 Jun 2013